<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NubMuffin &#187; search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nubmuffin.com/tag/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nubmuffin.com</link>
	<description>Tech News at its Best</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:42:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Search Engine Cuil is &#8220;Cool&#8221; but Useless</title>
		<link>http://nubmuffin.com/internet/search-engine-cuil-is-cool-but-useless/</link>
		<comments>http://nubmuffin.com/internet/search-engine-cuil-is-cool-but-useless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nubmuffin.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pronounced "cool," the new search engine Cuil created by former Google employees claims to have three times the amount of sites indexed as Google, ten times as that of Microsoft.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-94 alignleft" title="Cuil" src="http://nubmuffin.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/cuil.png" alt="Cuil, a new search engine" width="372" height="118" /></p>
<p>Pronounced &#8220;cool,&#8221; <a href="http://cuil.com">the new search engine at cuil.com</a> created by former Google employees claims to have three times the amount of sites indexed as Google, ten times as that of Microsoft.</p>
<p>Led by Anna Paterson and Tom Costello, Cuil&#8217;s secret lies in the formula used to index sites, an innovation that has allowed the company to index so many sites while spending only $7 million and using 140 servers. (In comparison, Yahoo!&#8217;s search engine cost $300 million.)</p>
<p><span id="more-93"></span></p>
<p>First, I have to give Cuil some credit for making a nice looking engine. Although I personally don&#8217;t like black, the display of the search results puts them in three columns, with large chunks of previews. (You can toggle over to two columns as well.)</p>
<p>Now, being able to search 121,617,892,992 pages is most definitely handy. Unfortunately, however, the old &#8220;quality versus quantity&#8221; adage may apply. There is <em>a lot</em> of junk on the Internet, and those 81,078,585,328 extra pages that Google doesn&#8217;t have (two-thirds of 121,617,892,992) may not be the search results one is looking for.</p>
<p>In addition, how the engine ranks those pages severely impacts search results. Do <a title="not the first result? ouch." href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=mildlyhotpeppers.com">a search for mildlyhotpeppers.com</a> (my web comic), and you&#8217;ll find that the site itself isn&#8217;t even the first result. Do a search for nubmuffin.com, and&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-95" title="cuil\'s high load" src="http://nubmuffin.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/highload.png" alt="" width="483" height="159" /></p>
<p>Apparently Cuil suffers from high load every single time I search for it. <a title="high load!?" href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=nubmuffin.com">Try it yourself</a>. Now, the probable reason is that NubMuffin is a new site, and it just hasn&#8217;t been indexed. Just tell me that outright &#8211; I can take it like a man. Don&#8217;t lie to me and tell me you&#8217;re suffering from high load &#8211; admit that you can&#8217;t find it, and move on! Jerks.</p>
<p>Finally, do <a title="cuil didn't index cuil?" href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=cuil.com">a search for cuil.com</a>, and you&#8217;ll see that it hasn&#8217;t indexed itself yet. I realize that it&#8217;s probably useless for a user on cuil.com to be searching for cuil.com, so this isn&#8217;t exactly criticism. <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=google.com">All</a> <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=yahoo.com">the</a> <a href="http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=msn.com">cool</a> <a href="http://www.ask.com/web?q=ask.com">kids</a> are doing it, though.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, do <a href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=muffins%20in%20new%20jersey">a search for &#8220;muffins in new jersey&#8221;</a> (I said more serious, not serious). The results are <em>very</em> interesting. The first result, &#8220;prowler candy apple red links to pictures of famous &#8230;,&#8221; led me to a page that could not be loaded (it timed out). The second result, &#8220;Frozen Yogurt Monmouth New Jersey. Of Customer &#8230;,&#8221; is about frozen yogurt. I can keep on going. I see American racing, native americans, a shameless pursuit of paper products, honey bee research jobs, and &#8220;Powell&#8217;s Books &#8211; Once Upon a Tart.&#8221; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=muffins+in+new+jersey">Search the same thing on Google</a>, and WHAT IS THIS!? The entire first, second, and third pages deal with MUFFINS.</p>
<p>Cuil, you might have a boat load of sites indexed, but to me that&#8217;s useless. As the BITS article suggests, sell yourself to another company -cough-Google-cough-, and the world would be a better place.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/cuils-new-search-engine-cheaper-than-google-but-not-better/?scp=1&amp;sq=cuil&amp;st=cse">Bits Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nubmuffin.com/internet/search-engine-cuil-is-cool-but-useless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
